World Journal of Engineering Research and Technology (WJERT) has indexed with various reputed international bodies like : Google Scholar , Index Copernicus , Indian Science Publications , SOCOLAR, China , International Institute of Organized Research (I2OR) , Cosmos Impact Factor , Research Bible, Fuchu, Tokyo. JAPAN , Scientific Indexing Services (SIS) , Jour Informatics (Under Process) , UDLedge Science Citation Index , International Impact Factor Services , International Scientific Indexing, UAE , International Society for Research Activity (ISRA) Journal Impact Factor (JIF) , International Innovative Journal Impact Factor (IIJIF) , Science Library Index, Dubai, United Arab Emirates , Scientific Journal Impact Factor (SJIF) , Science Library Index, Dubai, United Arab Emirates , Eurasian Scientific Journal Index (ESJI) , Global Impact Factor (0.342) , IFSIJ Measure of Journal Quality , 

World Journal of Engineering
Research and Technology

An International Peer Reviewed Journal for Engineering Research and Technology

ISSN 2454-695X

Impact Factor : 5.218

ICV : 79.45

News & Updation

  • Article Invited for Publication

    Article are invited for publication in WJERT Coming Issue

  • WJERT New Impact Factor

    Its our Pleasure to Inform you that WJERT Impact Factor has been increased from 4.236 to 5.218 due to high quality Publication at International Level

  • ICV

    WJERT Rank with Index Copernicus Value 79.45 due to high reputation at International Level

  • WJERT SEPTEMBER ISSUE PUBLISHED

    SEPTEMBER 2018 Issue has been successfully launched on 1 September 2018

  • New Issue Published

    Its Our pleasure to inform you that, WJERT 1 September 2018 Issue has been Published, Kindly check it on http://wjert.org/home/current_issues

Indexing

Review Procedure

World Journal of Engineering Research and Technology (WJERT) Peer review process ensures that the quality Journal publishes good science which is of benefit to whole scientific community. Peer review is an integral part of scientific publication that confirms the authenticity of the science reported.

After receiving a new manuscript, the editorial office will evaluate the article to confirm that the article is authentic, complete, ethically approved, correctly formatted, original research work, innovative, significance to the field, under the scope of the Journal, in the style of a scientific article and written in English language. If article has problems with any of the above criteria may be rejected.

Double-Blind Peer Review Process

Once an article manuscript is deemed suitable by the Editor(s)-in-Chief we follow the double-blind peer review process.

In Double blind review process neither authors nor reviewers know each other's identities.

Reviewers are given evaluation criteria and asked to provide comments to the author if any and may also provide feedback confidentially to the Editor office.

Reviewers evaluate a manuscript for Originality and significance of contribution, Satisfactoriness of methodology, analysis, and comprehension, Interest to research community and International relevance.

Once all reviews have been received, the Editor(s)-in-Chief, make reviews available to the author(s) and the comments to the author(s) of the manuscript

If the manuscript is accepted, then the author will be provided with the formatting guidelines for final submission. If the manuscript requires substantial revisions, then the author will be expected to follow the reviewer’s commentary and also the formatting guidelines for the re-submission of the manuscript. If the manuscript is rejected, then the process ends.